Chapter 4 here
The authors credit roughly speaking, two things with the success of the SDL at Microsoft:
- Executive support
- Education and Awareness
One interesting point in the introduction to the chapter is the reminder that secure software isn't the same as security software. Secure software is software that is resistant to attack, security software is software that is intended to specifically address a security concern.
The chapter has a history of security training at Microsoft. Based on the descriptions of training even before the formal SDL Microsoft was spending considerable money on training and development of its engineers. My guess is that if you've already got a corporate culture of training and education, implementing the specific training required for the SDL is going to be a lot easier than it would be at a place that doesn't already take training that seriously.
The chapter also has an overview of the current training courses for secure development available at Microsoft. I'm hoping that their future plans include making these public even on a for-fee basis so that the rest of the world can benefit from some of the work they have done.
One the sections in the chapter is on the value of exercises/labs as part of the training. They added a lab section to their thread modeling class and feedback scores went up and presumably the student's understanding of the materials as well.
Having attended and given several security training sessions I can definitely recommend this approach. I've had software security training from both Aspect and the old @stake folks and both classes had an interactive lab component. I took away a lot more from the courses than I have from most of the other security classes I've ever done.
One other interesting section in this chapter is Measuring Knowledge. At the time of the book's writing Microsoft didn't have a testing or certification program in place for their developers. I haven't had a chance to catch up with the SDL guys to see what their take is on the new SANS Software Security Initiative. I'll be interested to see how the SSI stuff shakes out and Microsoft's involvement.
Overall its interesting to see how much attention and dedication Microsoft has made to the SDL from a training perspective. The costs of the training alone in an organization the size of Microsoft is going to be enormous.
If you don't already have a robust internal training program in place in your organization this chapter does give a few hints on how to build one o the cheap. At the same time the chapter is more about the structure of the Microsoft training program than exactly how to go about building one. At the end of the chapter you're fairly convinced that you need a robust training program, but if you don't already have one you're going to be searching for a lot of external help to build one.